sitemap → 

A Universal Computer

The universe processes an exact number of internal bits every Planck time interval.

• Put the size of the universal processing unit at: Ubit = (2*(2*2)!)! Ibit =
12413915592536072670862289047373375038521486354677760000000000 Ibit =
10^27.9151647395435 kg*m2*s-1

This factorial 48! = 10^61.09390878810751 (a most universal constant – but 2*48! is equally beautiful)
helps as a conjecture to start NovaLoka's Universal Computer off… (it's an educated guess, don't worry ;–)
Follow the major constants of the universe and its age:

• The internal bit is the Planck constant or smallest possible impulse-momentum:
  Ibit = 10^-33.178744048564 kg*m2*s-1
• Planck time is the smallest possible time, Tbit = 10^-43.2683 s they say,
  but time does not exist, there are just processing events where quanta interact.
• The linear velocity of light is standardized as Lv1 = 299792458 m*s-1 (the light radius per second).
  The surface velocity on the light sphere is Lv2 = 4*pi*Lv1^2 = 10^18.05285127 m2*s-2
• The age of the universe is less certain, about:
  Uage = 1.373E10 y * 31556926 s/y = 10^17.637 s

The universe has been processing bits since the beginning and will continue until the end; its processor size Ubit is fixed, predetermined.
Inside the Universal Computer this is measured in time and known as conservation of energy, the total amount of energy which never gets lost.

• Universal energy is constant at: Uener = Ubit/Tbit = 10^71.1835 kg*m2*s-2
• Its linear rest mass Urest = Uener/Lv1^2 = 10^54.2298 kg follows via the famous E=mc2 formula.

This information theoretical mass is close to the mass of the universe deduced from observation.
In total our velocity is much lower than the speed of light, more likely the whole is relatively at rest.
Strange that the energy of the universe should solely be dependent upon Planck information constants…
Is space and time relativity (mass movement) all in the eye of the beholder?

• The total impulse-momentum of the universe increases with age, this is how far all has progressed:
  Iage = Ubit*Uage/Tbit = 10^88.8205 kg*m2*s-1

The universe is a slow operator. If it were to reprocess all its Iage/Ibit = 10^121.999 = 2^405.2725
currently processed bits, this would take 14 billion years again. Just hope nothing is forgotten…

• Planck surface is the smallest measure of spin information capacity, equal to the amount a light surface travels in a Planck time:
  Sbit = Tbit*Lv2 = 10^-25.21545 m2*s-1
  Of course it is mass that spins, moving with a speed determined by the capacity given (quantized by Sbit).
• The spin acceleration of the universe is the 1/Tbit = 10^43.2683 s-1 increase in its capacity to spin mass.
  The current spin capacity of the universe is therefore Sage = Lv2*Uage = 10^35.6898 m2*s-1
• The impulse-momentum of the universe divided by its spin capacity gives the total amount of spinning mass:
  Umass = Iage/Sage = 10^53.1306 kg but then 92% of mass 10^54.193 kg isn't spinning…?

Missing mass? Why?
Because Einstein's linear relativity does not hold for spinning mass!
Surface relativity is given by the formula E=m*Lv2 and I used it implicitely above to calculate the Umass for the full 100%.

It is NOT so that information quantity can be determined by the expansion of the universe or by any measure of space.
Space is the possibility of exchange of spin information between mass.
Space is the calculation itself, something that really doesn't make sense if you don't know what it's all about…

• When spin capacity is lowest, the smallest possible information mass (call it "surface Planck mass") is surprisingly large:
  Mmaxbit = Ibit/Sbit = 10^-7.9633 kg
• But with a spin capacity as big as the universe, the smallest possible information mass has become very small:
  Mminbit = Ibit/Sage = 10^-68.868 kg
• An electron has a mass of Melec = 10^-30.040511078 kg
  So for an electron to hold at least a bit of information (as all particles do) it must have a spin capacity of:
  Selec = Ibit/Melec = 10^-3.1382329706 m2*s-1
• The maximum energy [/frequency] of a particle (initialized at the big bang) is:
  Emax = Ibit/Tbit ~ 10^10.0896 kg*m2*s-2 = 7.67E28 eV [10^43.2683 s-1]
• For a particle (to currently get) 1 Ibit of information needs an energy [/frequency] of:
  Emin = Ibit/Uage ~ 10^-50.816 kg*m2*s-2 = 9.54E-33 eV [10^-17.637 s-1]

But if all was spin, nothing would be moving across straight lines, we wouldn't have any spin-offs, and straight lines was what Einstein was about (can't see them in the impulse-momentum universe though).

Critical questions to ask:
Why is there the concept of distance between points and why are there straight (or curved by ~God help~ mass) lines? How does it arise? What brings an observer under that impression? What is an observer that he may live in a volume in a space?

To measure distances we must make awkward calculations a^2+b^2 = c^2 so these are justified questions!
Why would a length have to be squared before it can be added to another squared length to create… a squared length? How low can you go, being at length?
In the universe surfaces are where bits exchange quantized spin information. Is the second dimension therefore the real thing?

No Sir! What's most familiar to us in this universal computer that processes information is time: the rate of interaction of bits. Like electricity time is switching the bits, making masses share energy, slow spin, fast spin, every force in the universe has its preferred surface of spin.
Time is not a dimension, but a quantity, a number of spin transfers per processor cycle. Also spin surface is not a geometry, but a number simulating infinite progression deep in the binary machine.
We think of a circle as being divided into 4 quarters and see pi pop up in its equations. But behind this lies an arbitrary geometrical construction; in a non-binary universe another pi' could power another rate of change exponent e'

Probability, pi and factorials (no mention of circles!) meet in John Wallis (1655) product, where, for a large number 2*n of binary flips (coin tosses) to have an equal outcome (heads 50%, tails 50%), the chance approaches:
P = (1*3*5*...*2*n-1)/(2*4*6*...*2*n) = 1/sqrt(pi*n)
This factorial-like division (as the machine goes) explains coincidental binary matches, and we can use it as an increasingly perfect factor for a spinning mass... to see its root radius [as an Exercise].

When the flow of time has past us by, what is left is energy rotating in a routine and inertia of mass: ever bigger, clumpier masses… Times change, purposes are lost. Straight lines are what is observed when energy gets exchanged.
But there could have been some other atom that was stealing your electron from the other side of its surface, you never know, you just got lucky… This computer is all about redistribution of spin, this is all that can happen in our universe. Mass is surface travelled in the past. Mass adds weight to information gathered. The Bang, the black hole, the Crunch, new wine into old wineskins.

If you think you are Ford Prefect and you can travel the universe in 42 Lyear on a towel and a cheap book you are wrong.
But if you think you can jelk off on big blobs all day long you are LEAD WRONG! Don't say I didn't warn ya!

Now for some more traditional astronomical figures:

• A light year is standardized at Lyear = 9460730472580800 m
• The diameter of the universe is a matter of debate, specially in this context which involves calculations by the universe as a whole.
  Earthly observers estimate the diameter at: Ud1 ~ 9E10*Lyear ~ 10^26.9 m
• Then the surface of the universe as a sphere is: Ud2 ~ pi*Ud1^2 ~ 10^54.3 m2
• And the volume of the universe as a sphere is: Ud3 ~ pi/6*Ud1^3 ~ 10^80.4 m3
• We derive the total mass of the universe (perhaps 73% dark energy, 23% cold dark matter and 4% ordinary matter) from a density measure and the volume:
  Umass ~ Udens*Ud3 ~ 10^-26.004 kg*m3 * 10^80.4 m3 ~ 10^54.4 kg
• From the surface of the universe follows the formula for the total energy of matter in the universe:
  Uener = Umass*Ud2 / Uage^2 ~ 10^73.4 kg*m2*s-2
• But then there's Einstein's special relativity of energy and mass and velocity, Uener = Umass*Lv1^2/sqrt(1-Uvelo^2/Lv1^2)
  which shows the mass inside our universe is moving suspiciously fast:
  Uv1 = Lv1*sqrt(1-Umass^2*Lv1^4/Uener^2) ~ 299780349 m*s-1 ~ 0.9999596*Lv1

If you don't like your dark stuff moving at 99.99% of the speed of light, fill in a velocity closer to Uv1 ~ 0*Lv1
then the mass, energy and diameter become smaller than your current estimates, and the age much bigger.

The principle is clear?

Representing large numbers is a problem, for which factorial and binary numbers offer the best solutions.
Therefore this article proposes a definition of a quantum-processor by:
Ubit = (2*(...(2*2)!..)! Ibit or by Ubit = 2*(...(2*2)..)! Ibit

Thank you.